19
Jun
09

More important team depth or superstars?

This is an age old debate amongst fantasy “ballers” out there what would you rather have a team with great overall depth? or a team with a few great starters sprinkled with some lesser players?

In my years playing fantasy sports I personally  always find that teams with “superstars” usually end up winning it for the most part. However they also are more than likely to lose easily if that big player gets hurt or doesn’t’ perform that week. While if you have depth and a good overall team 1 player being injured or under performing has less of an effect. My strategy in fantasy is always to have a good overall team depth wise.

Tell us in your opinion what is more important Depth or starters? What is your reasoning?


0 Responses to “More important team depth or superstars?”



  1. No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply